Note: I did not vote this year. I usual vote libertarian, but it was clear this year, that the party was completely compromised, and I really couldn’t find a good candidate for whom I could in good conscience vote.
What were they thinking ?
I still cannot understand anyone who claims to be ethical and still vote for the most corrupt US politician of all time , one who is as war-mongering as any crazed military general. How is that possible ?
When I see these butt-hurt liberal women in this video, and even most of the men look like little p*****s, I wonder what were they thinking ?
Were they thinking:
Now I won’t be able to invade more countries and murder a million more people ?
I didn’t keep America great by being the greatest genocidal country in the world ?
I didn’t get to commit more war and mayhem ?
I wanted more political corruption and we might not get it ?
I’m ready to kill a billion more people as long as a women is a president? . That they would compromise all and any morality and ethics to vote in a women – and prove the patriarchy wrong?
Seriously, what kind of insanity are we watching ? Because of the utter lack of any ethics or contemplation of the full result of their actions ,I call these liberals “stupid bitches”. They are the completely brainwashed useful idiot army of the oligarchy . My guess is the vast majority of them have read Animal Farm or 1984, yet they don’t realize it applies to them, succumbing to the same notions of equality and other simple propaganda devices as in the book! If you point it out, they will rage against you. Anything to keep the illusion and deluded self-image intact in spite of the obvious contradictions.
Are they Insane
Everywhere at high school and college campuses, the brainwashed kids are severely upset (remember Bezmenov — now in the 3rd generation of educational brainwashing — we have complete non-thinking automatons) . Here is a prime example at an elite university, no less :
After a historic Election Day, the University of Pennsylvania is reacting to the first election of one of its own alumni to the highest office of the United States.
Many professors canceled classes and examinations scheduled for Wednesday. A Wharton management professor claimed to “have heard from an unusual number of students this morning that they are unwell” and therefore offered a makeup date for the scheduled midterm. Other professors decided to postpone tests entirely…
One of the dorms on campus even set up a “breathing space” the night after election day. Cats, a puppy, coloring pages, and snacks were offered to help students “decompress in a low-key and low-stress environment.” The event certainly had a timid and fearful undertone, as students were hesitant to discuss what awaits the United States in January.
So adults are now petting puppies and coloring like kindergarten kids to cope with an election ? At first, I thought these kids belong in an mental institution, but then I realized all these kids were actually already in an insane asylum — the university and culture that promotes this lunacy !
The Red Guards of the Color Revolution
The frustration of the brainwashed masses then get channeled into social action — usually called “social justice” or some other high-sounding but self-destructive action. As they have used Nazis, low class commies, Ukrainian Banderites, and ignorant jihadis, and countless other useful idiots, the oligarchy will use these frustrated and idealistic lunatics to destroy the remaining resistance to the global oligarchy.
The problem with the liberal mindset is that it is driven by a totalitarian , holier-than-thou attitude that always results in exterminations of the “politically incorrect” – a term straight out of the Bolshevik revolution. Cultural suppression through enforced revolution (note all the jew social media sites now becoming the Ministries of Truth – suppressing all alternative news in true Newspeak fashion) , re-education (take any corporate HR class !) , gulags, and death camps are the end result.
Rape his wife…. really ?
We can see the left is the side that is creating the violence, not the right, though the Newspeak narrative is the opposite. The manufactured discourse attempts to create a social “truth” where even when the left commits the violence, it is the right’s fault — the same pattern in all totalitarian systems. For example, Russian jew commies would commit the violence, but in their propaganda , it was clearly the fault of the bourgeois; isn’t it the same now ?
The rise of the color revolution in America was clear to me in the Tayvon Martin case, where the news outlets were pushing for a race war, and the tone and rhythm has been getting more extreme ever since.
I don’t have the time to post all the evidence, but it is book-worthy, to see the large funding going to violent prone militant groups from the large NGOs funded by governments and/or jewish-backed organization and into both leftist and republican candidates. Soros is just one of many. The divide-and-conquer (and dominate) strategy still works. Keep all the groups fighting each other rather than taking down the real problem. Thus, we have stupid bitches crying over the election loss of the stupid bitch that dominates them. Wow — real life is always so much more amazing than the movies.
The speed and intensity of the protest is the most shocking aspect. I had thought it would take some more time for the open civil war to break out, but the reaction to the election hints that we are rapidly approaching the breaking stage. The US as a body politic holding together is no longer possible. There should be no illusions that this outcome is due to a coordinated attack ,as discussed on this blog, by the neo-marxist Frankfurt school which promoted feminism, minority rights, and immigration to break apart American society. The final rise of the violent Red Guard now faces American society.
As in all color revolutions, any repression by the state will be spun as a suppression of rights. Just look at anything Trump suggests. If you want to deport violent, criminal illegal aliens — the story is spun, not just in the media but by the paid-off politicians.Not only do they refuse to go along with a rational policy, but paint Trump as against Mexicans or other minorities. They refuse to do anything that will ensure their survival because they have been brainwashed into a completely different value system. The left will resort to more violence and any legitimate police action in return will be interpreted as the illegal violence of the “deplorables”. This is how the color revolutions have been used everywhere and now it is in full manifestation in the USA.
Media as Propaganda
One great outcome of this election cycle is that the mainstream media as complete propaganda is self-evident. The reporting was so slanted, it cannot be denied. With only a handful of jewish run companies owning the main media companies, they now have a monopoly on the content and tone of the news.
This presidential election may have the most lopsided batch of newspaper endorsements the US has ever seen.While Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton has garnered the support of a long list of editorial boards, her Republican rival Donald Trump hasn’t received any. Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson has six.A number of conservative-leaning papers have even cautioned voters against putting Trump in office, and said they too are “with her.” (GatrehouseMedia: See list)
Donald did a handful of support from some small independent papers, though no major ones as the above article states.
The Florida Times-Union and Bowling Green (Ky.) Daily News joined a coterie of Trump-backing papers that includes the Las Vegas Review-Journal, owned by GOP mega donor Sheldon Adelson, and small dailies such as the St. Joseph (Mo.) News-Press, Santa Barbara News-Press, Waxahachie (Tex.) Daily Light, Times-Gazette of Hillsboro, Ohio, and Antelope Valley Press of Palmdale, Calif. (ChicagoTribune)
Given the country was split 50-50, where is the representation of the other half in the media ? Clearly it does not exist, and it was even worse in the television media. As pointed out in the previous article, the oligarchy moved the money completely away from Trump , and it is clear they did so with the media also. So why would you believe anything in the media, they work for the oligarchy, not for you — even if this time they supported your candidate?
Deep Ties of The Media : Polling
The ties of the media go much deeper than just endorsement and tilted news stories. We know that they were feeding the debate questions to Clinton in advance.
One of the most used strategies to influence public opinion is polls. Humans want to be on the winning team. Polls can be used to convince the undecided to vote for the front-runner in the poll or to discourage the viewer from voting if the viewer thinks his candidate is losing badly.
As my friends know, I called out this strategy when they placed Ben Carson at the head of the polls. Out of dozens of people I spoke with, not one was for Dr. Carson — so how was it that the poll was showing the opposite ?
Ben Carson has surged into the lead of the Republican presidential race, getting support from 29 percent of GOP primary voters, according to a brand-new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll.
That’s the highest percentage any GOP candidate has obtained so far in the survey.
Carson’s 29 percent is followed by Donald Trump at 23 percent, Marco Rubio at 11 percent, Ted Cruz at 10 percent and Jeb Bush at 8 percent. These findings are similar to a New York Times/CBS poll released last week, which also showed Carson in first place in the national GOP contest. (NBCNews Nov4 2015)
He got less that 3% of all votes, and about 6% before he quit. How could the polls be that wrong ? Because they were not real polls, they were propaganda pieces meant to influence under the guise of scientific polling!
Deceptive polling is tried and true strategy that I’ve seen running for 20 years. Here is one from the past – this time on the Democratic side, where they wanted to shoot down Howard Dean who was the favorite going into the races — they fabricated that Wesley Clark was the front-runner out of nowhere — and no one had even heard of who he was !!! From Gallup in 2003
September 24, 2003
Democrats competitive with Bush in trial heats
GALLUP NEWS SERVICE
PRINCETON, NJ — The latest CNN/USA Today/Gallup Poll shows Ret. Army Gen. Wesley Clark’s entry into the race for the Democratic nomination has for the moment greatly changed the campaign’s character. Just days after announcing, Clark has almost a 10-percentage-point lead over all other candidates for the nomination. Additionally, Clark tends to fare better among the leading Democratic candidates in hypothetical head-to-head matchups with President George W. Bush, although the data currently indicate the race would be close if the election were held today, regardless of which Democrat would oppose Bush.
He got 3% of the vote also ! Again, this was a fake poll — it was not in any way scientific and this was 12 years ago !
(Note that they got Dean eventually by attempting to show that he was crazy — as they did with Trump, but being an Alpha male he fought back twice as hard, whereas Dean knuckled under and the label of being crazy doomed him ! )
Please do not read anything in any of the mainstream papers as anything but pure Newspeak. I know it is hard to believe they lie to you, but they do. Orwell told you, but you prefer to live in a fantasy land. The manipulation works on both sides, making sure their preferred candidate(s) wins – it is not about Republican or Democrat. They prefer both sides be their man — as in most elections. This manipulation has been going on for decades, but now everyone is becoming aware .
The deep evidence(though it has always been there if you looked) comes from Wikileaks’ release of the Podesta emails, concerning the Democratic strategy.
But, He is a Crass Clown
A huge number of people could not vote for Trump because of his obvious flaws, the most odious to me being his authoritarian mindset. I will reveal the real Donald Trump soon, but as far as the election results, why didn’t people vote 3rd party ? This was my decision decades ago..if they are both bad, why do 60% of the eligible( 40% don’t vote) population vote for the two worst people ?
Clearly, some deep human psychology is at work, keeping people from stepping outside the box. Why is it so hard to reject the two repulsive sides not representative of your values, and take any other option ?
A Winner , Any Winner
One clear reason is that people want to be on the side of the winner. You can clearly see this in sports — no one wants to be associated with the loser. This must have some ancient survival bias based on social dynamics — those that complained against the winner surely were repeatedly wiped out…better to swallow your ethics and live ! But, does that really hold true, today ? Certainly not in recent times in the US, but we are rapidly approaching the situation because of the totalitarian policies of both parties.
To keep with the winners, people ignore the outcomes. They complain about the corruption and the money wasted on war in their parties and on Facebook, but they keep voting for their masters who loot them. Very few people have the sense of self-worth and confidence to survive losing repeatedly in fighting for a better society.
Part of the Hive
Certainly, a lot of the above also relates to being part of the group. Most people want to fit in and not be considered odd by their peers. Easier in all social interactions to be in the same party as your peers. This explains why Muslims remain Muslims even though the vast majority know it is not a religion of peace — and can’t leave the society (and be possibly killed for it, as per Sharia law). So a lot of economic, social , and psychological benefits accrue to remaining in a dysfunctional system rather than rebelling. The only problem is that eventual the system crashes because the “rebels” could not make the corrections required to refresh the system.
One also sees the small mind phenomena.Given the huge number of issues, many people focus on just the one or two most important to them. As at the beginning of the article, a lot of “stupid bitches” just care to get a woman in the office to prove something. This is pure ego stroking at the expense of society. When one’s self-worth is deeply intertwined with some narrow materialistic concept, these insane decisions follow and the wheels of karma rapidly crashes the system.
Too much effort
Clearly, it is too much effort to think outside the box or to organize a better solution. People don’t want to spend the effort and would rather just have the decision made for them. When people give up their inherent power, they allow sociopaths to take power. This seems to be the standard human condition. Wolves looting the sheep who just want to be left alone.
Given this state of affairs, it is even more important that government have the least amount of power to minimize the amount of domination and looting. This is the hardest concept for most people to accept — that you can get all the services and results you wanted without the government. For example, there was no Department of Education before Pres. Carter — yet the US had one of the best education systems. Now, the DoE is coercing Common Core on everyone so that they can dumb down the curriculum to make the niggers, spics, rednecks, and assorted yahoos look equal in the neomarxist framework. Stupid bitches don’t realize they are going to end up in Zimbabwe all the while thinking they are progressives.
I am sure many more reasons drive people to not vote for work to actualize their own values and self-interest. Contradictorially, they take actions that make them complicit or ,as Orwell said, accomplices in some of the most heinous and despicable crimes of humanity. There is no difference between German Nazis and Americans today or most people in the world. 99% enable an insane world which they spend all their time complaining about. Now is the time to become the 1% before the US truly ends up broken and another Zimbabwe.